🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our children's youth". Legislation could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to approve a proposal increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a related step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a good foundation," stated one European lawmaker behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by robust evidence".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is largely unfolding at the state level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with extra access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain figures to follow this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond the West, further countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world bodies adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion continues, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments internationally are less and less willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.